Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROMO v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., 742 F.3d 909 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: infco20140210127 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 13-56310, shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge McKEOWN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., No. 13-56310, shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge McKEOWN did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer